SMB
Outsourcing
Executive Summary
The mounting cost of IT services puts considerable pressure on the scarce financial and staff resources of
Small to Mid-size Businesses (SMBs). This suggests that offshore outsourcing, with its promise of cost
reduction, would strongly appeal to SMBs. But less than one in five SMBs currently has an offshore
outsourcing strategy in place.
The reason for this is that smaller companies must overcome unique strategic and operational challenges
in order to make offshore outsourcing work. These include limited expertise, a shorter planning horizon,
and concerns around choosing the right mid-tier vendor. To maximize business benefits, SMBs must not
only develop an outsourcing strategy and choose an appropriate vendor, but also build the right
management skills, create effective communication channels, and then persevere in the process in order
to learn and improve over time. Unfortunately, best practice advice and consulting expertise are largely
skewed towards Fortune 1000 companies and often do not apply to smaller firms.
This paper discusses the reasons why mid-size companies have been slow to embrace offshore
outsourcing. Intended for those who have decided to pursue offshore outsourcing, it explores ways in
which smaller firms can effectively plan and implement an offshore outsourcing strategy to reap the same
competitive advantages as their larger counterparts, including reduced IT costs, improved process
management, and greater business agility.
Introduction
As the technology prerequisites for doing business become more complex and expensive, mid-tier
companies struggle to meet basic IT needs. While Fortune 1000 enterprises can amortize the mounting
cost of IT services across a large user base, Small to Mid-size Businesses (SMBs) must provide many of the
same capabilities – from e-mail to high-speed Internet access to a dynamic Website – with a fraction of the
resources. Specialized requirements like e-business services or mobile applications make the challenge
greater still.
How can SMBs provide enterprise-scale technology on a mid-size budget? Offshore outsourcing seems
like an appealing solution, offering technology expertise and superior process management at a lower
cost. Yet the great majority of SMBs have not yet considered offshore outsourcing as part of their business
strategy. As of January 2005, only 19% of smaller companies reported having an offshore outsourcing
1
strategy in place, as compared to 95% of the Fortune 1000.
Outsourcing Challenges for SMBs
Offshore outsourcing presents SMBs with strategic and operational challenges that are easier for large
organizations to overcome.
Strategic Challenges
Strategic issues are those that relate to planning and long-term time horizons. The principal strategic
problems that small and mid-size companies face with respect to offshore outsourcing are limited
expertise and a shorter planning horizon.
Lack of Expertise
Fortune 1000 companies have large IT organizations and a great number of project managers and
administrators dedicated to planning an outsourcing strategy. Drawing on best practices and their own in
house experience, they carefully consider what projects to outsource, how to leverage distributed
development models, and how to build a business case.
By comparison, IT departments in SMBs are skeletal and intently focused on immediate, day-to-day IT
concerns. Often there is little bandwidth left over to develop an offshore outsourcing strategy. In fact,
capacity constraint due to a lack of resources is what prompts many companies to look at outsourcing as a
solution.
Another problem in planning offshore outsourcing is the lack of advice specific to smaller firms. The trade
press focuses on outsourcing almost exclusively from the standpoint of engagements among larger
enterprises. However, advice that works for large organizations with dedicated, expert teams may be of
little value to the streamlined staff at a small organization. Too often, SMBs are left to fend for themselves
through ad hoc research and recommendations from colleagues. This leads to uncertainty and reinforces
the impression that offshore outsourcing is “only for big companies.”
One way to prepare effectively for a new outsourcing relationship is by inducting someone with
outsourcing experience to spearhead the initiative. Another approach is to tap external expertise by
contracting with an independent outsourcing consultant. This consultant can be a valuable resource in the
initial structuring of an outsourcing engagement and in facilitating critical knowledge transfer.
A Shorter Planning Horizon
With their smaller management teams and shorter-term perspective, SMBs find it inherently more difficult
to take a future-oriented approach to running their business. Many SMBs do not operate with the multi
year strategic plans that are typical of Fortune 1000 companies. However, up-front preparation is perhaps
the single most critical factor in successful offshore outsourcing. A recent study found the lack of
preparation and planning on the part of the client to be the primary reason for the failure of offshore
initiatives.
All too frequently, SMBs fall into offshore outsourcing engagements out of tactical necessity. Perhaps a
competitor has introduced a new, customer-facing system that gives them an advantage. Or a key
member of the IT staff has left the company. In the face of such unexpected events, many companies
choose to connect hastily with an outsourcing vendor. However, the reactive introduction to offshore
outsourcing presents inherent risks. A company can arrive at a more pragmatic plan for leveraging
offshore outsourcing by looking at the total picture of its ITactivity, ideally during the budgeting process for
the upcoming year. By understanding that outsourcing is a medium- to long-term process, small and midsize companies will be able to avoid costly mistakes that are often the result of a purely tactical approach.
Operational Challenges
Even for SMBs that address offshore outsourcing strategically, the decision to begin is only the first step.
The challenge remains for the operational side of the business to execute the strategy. When it comes to
getting the work of offshore outsourcing done, SMBs may again confront a shortage of staff and expertise.
There may be no one in house with direct experience in outsourcing: to scope out the work to be done;model the stages of the project; negotiate pricing and contractual safeguards; manage communication,
knowledge transfer and project execution processes; and address the numerous other details that come
into play as the engagement unfolds.
Choosing Projects for Outsourcing
When outsourcing is a reactionary move, companies often outsource projects with which they are
experiencing difficulties, such as a shortage of skills or time. However, those projects may not be the best
choice for outsourcing, especially at the beginning of an outsourcing relationship. When considering what
type of work to send offshore, SMBs should consider handling new development work in-house, or at least
locally, and planning their outsourcing activities by going through a methodical process. They may find that
the right projects for an initial offshore outsourcing relationship may well be those that they already
handle competently in house. Such projects are more likely to embody process documentation and other
forms of readily transferable knowledge and can therefore be more effectively managed remotely.
It is important to remember that outsourcing providers have learning curves, too, and that a welldelineated and well-managed project allows both teams to come together without drawing too heavily on
the client’s expertise. The matrix in Table 1 provides guidance on the selection of activities or projects for
outsourcing offshore.
High Domain Expertise Required | Low Domain Expertise Required | |
---|---|---|
Highly Mission Critical | Not suitable for outsourcing. | Suitable for outsourcing, but requires safeguards to reduce the risk of project disruption. |
Less Mission Critical | Suitable for outsourcing, but requires a strong knowledge transfer mechanism. | Suitable for outsourcing. |
Provided that appropriate safeguards and knowledge transfer processes have been established, SMBs
can outsource a wider range of projects offshore without incurring unacceptable risk. Additional
safeguards can help mitigate risks, such as building in redundancies for mission critical work and
contractually ensuring the close supervision of the vendor. Similarly, documentation and codification,
along with in-house training of the partner staff, can facilitate knowledge transfer.
Choosing a Partner
Having decided that offshore outsourcing is the right approach, a business must find the right partner to
Trigent 2 Willow Street, Suite 201, Southborough, MA 01745 1-877-387-4436 trigent.com
Trigent Software, Inc. All trademarks, marked and unmarked, are the property of their respective owners.
support the effort. There are hundreds of competent, mid-sized outsourcing firms in India alone. The
difficulty lies in selecting a subset of companies that are most
likely to fit the bill and then evaluating them individually.
A mid-size company naturally seeks a mid-size supplier.
Unfortunately, these suppliers lack the visibility of their larger
counterparts. Each presents potential customers with an
appealing Web site touting its team talent, vast engineering
resources, years of experience, state-of-the art facility, and
glowing client testimonials. The vast majority of these firms are
well staffed, experienced, and highly competent to undertake a
wide range of projects. Their pricing structures are equally
comparable, due to the intensely competitive nature of their
business.
The difference between offshore outsourcing vendors from a
prospective client’s point of view lies in their specific domain
expertise, corporate culture, and consulting style. Some
suppliers will focus mainly on solving technical problems. Others
are better set up to devote time to understanding the client’s
business process and strategy. Some have broad industry
knowledge, while others target niche markets.
Criteria for Evaluating Outsourcing Vendors
- In what core businesses does the vendor specialize?
- Does the vendor focus on developing reusable software modules, knowledge management systems and SOA frameworks to bring down implementation costs?
- Does the vendor abide by industry standards like CMMI, Six Sigma and ISO 9001 Quality Management System certification?
- What are the vendor’s security practices and data privacy safeguards?
- Does the vendor have onshore staff to assist with project management and communication?
- How much attention can the vendor’s top management team give to the proposed project(s)?
Applying the Right Evaluation Criteria
Given the similarities among mid-size outsourcing suppliers, it is
difficult for SMBs to develop a short list of potential partners. A
useful starting point is to specify the right evaluation criteria (see
sidebar).
Most of these criteria are applicable to enterprises as well as smaller businesses. In addition to these wellpublicized criteria, SMBs must consider two other factors:
- The duration of key client relationships. Prospective clients should request references, call them and determine the amount of repeat business they have given the vendor. Long-term partnerships indicate not only that the client is satisfied with the vendor, but also that the vendor can successfully work and learn collaboratively over time to maximize the business value of the partnership.
- Stability of supplier’s management team. While high turnover of technical staff is a ubiquitous problem of the outsourcing industry, a more important concern for the SMB is the stability of a vendor’s management team. These are the people who will address significant problems and maintain continuity of contact between the organizations.
By applying these additional criteria, SMBs can gain a strong sense of a mid-tier vendor’s stability and
reliability over the long haul.
Making Offshore Outsourcing Work
For small-to-mid-size firms that have successfully met the challenges of developing an outsourcing
strategy, identified an appropriate partner and negotiated a contract, a final challenge remains: making
the arrangement work in a way that maximizes business benefits. Key factors include:
- Persistence
- Taking responsibility for results
- Developing key management skills
- Leveraging the partnership
Persistence
It takes time to establish efficient communication, exchange useful information and gain real value from
the relationship. Too many mid-size companies fail to realize that the most beneficial offshore outsourcing
engagements are not one-time events. The ability to improve the process in the long run is a major
element in the successful offshoring initiatives of many Fortune 1000 firms. Businesses, like individuals,
need time to make mistakes and learn from them. “Lessons learned” can come from any number of places.
The key is to stay the course long enough to make use of the lessons, generally for a period well beyond
one fiscal year. By building experience over time, each organization can refine its unique set of offshore
outsourcing best practices that can be leveraged for ongoing value.
Once senior management has decided on offshore outsourcing as a business strategy, it is essential to stay
committed and align the support of key decision-makers. This ensures that the strategy is embraced
consistently at all operational levels. If the outgoing CTO was committed to outsourcing and the new CTO
strongly believes otherwise, time and money may well be wasted.
Taking Responsibility for Results
Outsourcing a problem does not automatically solve it. Instead, outsourced resources must be managed
as carefully as in-house resources. Regardless of the size of the company, a successful offshore outsourcing engagement requires clients to communicate complete information about goals and
requirements. No amount of technical expertise on the part of the vendor can make up for poor
requirements definitions or weak communication links. Simply “throwing the problem over the wall” to the
outsourcer is likely to result in disappointment. In such instances, the client company underestimates the
scope and corresponding effort that its own responsibilities entail. For example, software engineers in the
vendor’s organization are not in a position to make decisions about features and requirements that are
usually made by the client’s business analyst. The disappointment caused by implicit assumptions very
often results in high levels of dissatisfaction with outsourcing itself
Developing Key Management Skills
Besides specifying requirements, SMBs also need to hone the management competencies that are
relevant to outsourcing relationships. This can be difficult for even the largest and most sophisticated
organizations.
Fundamentally, outsourcing is a form of delegation that revolves around identifying clear goals and
measuring progress toward them effectively. Training in how to delegate is especially important for
outsourcing project managers. A formal training program can help these managers develop cultural
sensitivity and other “soft” skills required for successful outsourcing.
There is also a wide range of other factors, such as logistical and time zone differences, which can impact
the management of offshore relationships. The key to addressing these factors successfully is a policy of
open, ongoing communication and interaction between client and vendor. Building personal
relationships, such as through periodic visits between facilities, further promotes mutual understanding
and success.
Leveraging the Partnership
Establishing a long-term partnership with a suitable provider is the best ways to realize maximum benefit
from offshore outsourcing. When the offshore team works as an extension of the in-house staff, it has time
to capitalize on lessons learned and adjust to the client’s style of working. This improves communication
and promotes rapid, more effective problem solving. Each team needs to have realistic expectations about
the information, skills, and responsiveness that they can expect from the other.
A partnership approach will also help the outsourcing vendor provide better value than is otherwise
possible. Outsourcing vendors are frequently asked by prospects what guarantees they can make about
the technical talent available for a project. Yet it is often the potential client-not the vendor’s HR policies or
wage scale-that is the most critical factor in attracting talent to the vendor’s organization. The best people
want to know what they will be working on. If clients are committed to long-term relationships and vendors know specifically what technical expertise they need to provide, they can more easily attract the right
people to do the work. The result is better quality work from the vendor and better value for the client.
Summary
Small-to-mid-size businesses face unique challenges in their effort to leverage offshore IT outsourcing. At
the strategic level, the highest hurdles include a shortage of resources, a lack of expertise, and a tendency
to act tactically rather than strategically. Specific operational challenges that SMBs face in implementing
an offshore outsourcing strategy include choosing appropriate projects to outsource and identifying the
right vendor to help with the effort. By approaching offshore outsourcing in a strategic manner as longterm relationships rather than “one-shot deals,” small to mid-size companies can meet their goals of
reduced IT costs, improved process management, and greater business agility in a competitive
marketplace.